Some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (like physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Write an essay on the importance of these subjects. Difference between Academic Vs Non-Academic Subjects.
Academic Vs Non-Academic Subjects
What young people should study at school has long been the subject of intense debate and this is a question, which certainly does not have a single correct answer.
Young people deserve the best possible chance to do well at school. In a traditional curriculum, there is a wide variety of subjects with a mix of academic and non-academic In this way, a young person is formed with an all-round education. Non-academic subjects include sports, cooking, woodwork, and metalwork. I believe this is the best form of education. A young person should learn things other than academic subjects. Sport is particularly important. Young people should love the sport so that they can be fit and healthy in their later life. If not, we will be raising an obese and unfit generation.
However, one cannot neglect the point of view that education is so important that students must be pushed as hard as possible to achieve their best. It sounds a good idea to only expose the students to academic subjects as they can spend all of their school hours on studying the subjects that will get them into university and good jobs later in life. Nevertheless, I feel most people are not so studious in nature and would benefit more from a more vocationally based education. Forcing academic studies onto them would lead to failure and the students leaving school too early.
Therefore, one can say that a wholly academic curriculum would be the best for the future of students but is difficult to impose on them as most students find non-academic subjects as important and attractive as academic subjects.